|
Shots across
the
bow
|
Thoughts about real estate from the buyer's point of view A monthly newsletter sent out to previous and present clients as well as a selected list of different businesses in the Niagara Peninsula |
|
April 2008
Two other choices
Last month I dealt with the argument for starting
out by renting something instead of buying it. I also mentioned that
the Rent To Own and Renting With An Option To Buy ideas are two other
approaches that are worth considering in certain circumstances.
The case for them is likely to be a financial one
(for example because you don't have a downpayment) rather than any hestitation
about choosing a permanent residence when you're relocating and aren't
very familiar with the new area and somewhat unsure about where the best
place to live -- and obtain value -- happens to be.
Unfortunately, though, the two options tend not
to be all that available in most of today's markets. Back in the 90s
they could often be found, but this was when Sellers were unquestionably
faced with a Buyers' market and, worse still, likely to see prices dropping
every month or so. It therefore seemed useful to offer potential purchasers
a decided incentive to make an offer. In effect, the traditional need
for a downpayment was set aside and it was possible for people to rent
a property with one of two agreed upon rights to eventually become its owner.
Since then, however, the market has recovered from
-- and invariably advanced beyond -- the economic doldrums of what I'm given
(as you may know) to calling the Mulroney error. Moreover, the banks
have become a great deal more liberal in their willingness to finance house
purchases. Into the bargain, they've come to show a lot less interest
in backing Rent To Own and Renting With An Option To Buy transactions.
A shame perhaps, but I guess it's part of progress
-- in Canada at least.
Only in Canada, eh?
In my January newsletter, I maintained that the
US market fallout was unlikely to spread across our borders. The root
of it lay in sub-prime mortgages arranged by American lenders that made
it too easy for people to buy what in all reality they had little or no
hope of paying for. In contrast, not only was
our economy stronger, but also Canadian lenders were -- and still are --
less inclined to cast caution aside.
Even so, the past few months here in Niagara (and
other communities) have seen a somewhat slower sales rate. Listings
aren't moving quite as quickly as they did and bidding wars have become
much rarer than they were. However, most Canadian agents are falling
back on the longtime belief that "sales come and go and sometimes you
have to work harder than usual to obtain them."
Small comfort no doubt to sellers (not to mention
listing agents) who are wondering where all the buyers have gone, but no
one in authority is likening the situation to the problems faced by so many
US households.
A possible resurrection?
Nevertheless, if we are starting to witness a return
to a Buyers' market -- although I, for one, have yet to be convinced of
it -- some sellers (and their listing agents) may well see merit in reviving
the Rent To Own and Renting With An Option To Buy concepts. The likelihood
is much greater in the US as a way to dispose of excess inventory, but our
local market(s) may also begin to re-introduce the ideas to generate sales
for properties that are lingering much longer than anyone wants.
In any case, despite the reservations in this newsletter,
I think I owe it to my readers to walk through the specifics of the two
ideas. If nothing else, it will allow me to make my comments so far
somewhat clearer.
So then ...
Rent To Own
The essential idea is that as a tenant you get the
seller/landlord to agree that you can (and indeed will) eventually purchase
the property in question.
The rent amount and the purchase price are subject
to negotiation, but usually the rent includes an amount that's above the
norm and is treated as an accumulating downpayment. At the time of
purchase, the total extra payments are deducted from the selling price
and a mortgage is arranged for the balance due to the seller.
As a buyer, your benefit is that you can move into
the house before you have the downpayment saved up and, dependent on the
agreed upon purchase figure, can strike a deal at today's price rather than
tomorrow's.
Needless to say, the seller has to be open to what
you consider to be fair, but his/her benefit lies in an immediate sale (albeit
of a different kind) rather than what might be a long wait to find
a buyer.
Renting With An Option To Buy
This idea doesn't commit either you or the seller
to an eventual transaction. but it does ensure that as a buyer you have
what's called the First Right of Refusal. In other words, although
the seller can consider an offer from someone else, he/she is then bound
to give you the chance to buy the property instead.
Both the rent amount and purchase price are subject
to negotiation, of course, but there isn't any accumulating downpayment involved.
The rent will be a market one and the price may reflect the present value
or an anticipated figure in the future.
Your benefit as a buyer is the time you're given to
decide whether or not to make the property your own. You have chance
to weigh up the pros and cons and, in effect, to be no worse off than the
rent you pay while making up your mind.
As far as the seller is concerned, he/she at least
has an assured rental income until you elect to buy -- or, if you decide
not to do so, to possibly have you agree to simply remain as a tenant.
Arranging the paperwork
The real estate industry's Agreement of Purchase
and Sale pages don't readily lend themselves to either of the ideas,
especially because there's an absolute need for wording that unmistakably
spells out the terms agreed upon by the buyer and seller. Like as
not, however, these can usually be located in the Schedule A that forms part
of an offer, despite the difficulties that arise when it comes to "fill in
the blank" lines such as price, deposit, and closing date on preceding pages.
Even so, though, the phrase "see Schedule A" can invariably be used to overcome
this problem.
What is important is the incorporation of the mutually
agreed figures for rent and purchase price, as well as the date that applies
for concluding the transaction.
A Rent To Own agreement will include the extra amount
that's going to accumulate as a downpayment, the period of time that applies
to this accumulation, and the purchase price balance that will be due to
the seller on closing.
A Renting With An Option To Buy agreement will specify
the rent, the envisaged purchase price, and the date by which the buyer
is required to exercise his/her option.
In both cases, the purchase price can be either
agreed upon in advance or it can be subject to an appraisal at the relevant
time.
In general you can rely upon the agents from
both sides of the transaction to get the wording correct, but it will
do no harm to have any offer include a clause that allows you a few
days to have things vetted by your lawyer.
Getting a mortgage
Not many lenders are willing to commit to a mortgage
in advance, especially when you're probably looking at a couple of years
to build up your downpayment or to arrive at the time to exercise your option.
Even so, you're well advised to have a bank official or mortgage broker
look your offer over.
Not the least reason is the rules that the Central
Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) nowadays tends to impose on these
"non-standard" transactions. Without worrying you unduly about them,
suffice to say that an offer cannot exist after the fact, but MUST have
been created and signed in the beginning.
Yes or No?
In spite of all I've said, I'd be remiss if I encouraged
you to view either of these ideas with great enthusiam. There are
circumstances when they do make sense, especially when you don't have a downpayment
or can't be certain about buying a property. However, they call for
some caution, not to mention the need for a seller who won't look at them
askance. Most of all, I suppose, you need a seller who's tired of
waiting for a "regular" buyer to turn up on his/her doorstep.
But chance IS a fine thing, isn't it? And you never know, DO
you?
With my best wishes now that ... sumer is icumin
in (if I may repeat a title I used in June 2003 when I first began these
newsletters!)
Duncan Pollock, Real Estate Broker,427 Gate Street, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario, Canada L0S 1J0 Tel: 905-468-3154 Fax: 905-468-3812 Cellular: 905-704-9037 email: duncanpollock@sympatico.ca Note: E-mail addressed changed as above on Nov 3 2007 website: http://www.duncanpollock.com
PS. One of my web pages
provides a list of the other newsletters I've sent out. If you choose to
go to it, you can click on any title to bring up its full text.
PPS. I've recently been invited and encouraged to create a second website, one that deals with my approach to the industrial, commercial, and investment real estate market. You can reach it, if you're so inclined, at http://www.iciniagara.com. |
This is an online copy of my April 2008 newsletter -- and you can find a list of the other ones I've sent out by clicking here. If you aren't already included in my mailing list, you are most welcome to add your name to it so you can receive a similar "Shot Across the Bow" each month. There's nothing hard sell involved, I can assure you. Rather, the idea is to share my thoughts with you about how I believe buyers can be better served by the real estate industry. Thank you. |
Join my mailing list |
|---|