|
Are you being
served?
Despite
the use -- and usefulness -- of computers in the real estate business nowadays,
the number of forms people are being asked to sign is increasing. The
latest example is what's called a Buyer Customer Service Agreement that,
gulp, sets out in writing how buyers are not going to be served
if they're in the hands of listing agents and other real estate people whose
primary duty is to look after the seller's best interests. Sounds
confusing? Well, not really. It's all to do with the critical
difference between treating people as "clients" or "customers" -- and a
growing interest by the real estate industry in having a paper trail that
can defend agents who stand accused of failing to serve people properly.
I know I'm not alone in fretting about how well the legalities are understood -- and never mind observed -- by many agents, let alone the public they're dealing with. Yet the right and necessary approach to sellers and buyers isn't all that complicated. An agent's primary duty is to look after a principal's best interests, which makes them a client and therefore labels anyone else a customer who's entitled to honest and fair dealings (but no more than that). The differentiation is clear enough when it comes to a Listing Agent whose commitment to a seller/client is to get what I'm fond of referring to as "the most money for the house." There's also no doubt regarding a Buyer Agent's role in getting his buyer/client what I like to call "the most house for the money." However, when an agent doesn't have so obvious a connection with people, the situation is open to question -- and ergo the sense of setting things out in writing or, at the least, ensuring sufficient verbal explanation for a potential purchaser to know what level of service can be expected from the agent. In
my January newsletter,
I argued against signing a Buyer Agency Agreement and I suppose I must now
make a case for ignoring the need for a Buyer Customer Service Agreement.
At the same time, though, I did mention my ongoing habit of making my relationship
to people unmistakably clear: I'll treat them as clients from day
one and run the risk of losing them if I don't live up to the expectations
this implies. Thus, I'm not afraid to suggest that an agent who'd
rather not (or, representing the seller, is legally unable to) treat a buyer
as a client simply needs to eliminate, in much the same way, all doubt
about this relationship. Or, if you wish, this kind of agent should
make quite sure that people who want to buy something know that they're going
to be treated as customers not clients -- which, of course, is the reason
why the Buyer Customer Service Agreement is now being put forward as a means
of proving the fact. However,
in view of all this, what should you do as a buyer when meeting up with real
estate salespeople? What it all comes
down to, I guess, is the need for the real estate industry to make its relationships
to the people it serves much clearer than they are. But this, of course,
is where I came in, isn't it?!!
Duncan
Pollock, Real Estate Broker, |
This is an online copy of my March 2004 newsletter -- and you can find a list of the other ones I've sent out by clicking here. If you aren't already included in my mailing list, you are most welcome to add your name to it so you can receive a similar "Shot Across the Bow" each month. There's nothing hard sell involved, I can assure you. Rather, the idea is to share my thoughts with you about how I believe buyers can be better served by the real estate industry. Thank you. |
Join my mailing list |
|---|